Researchers consistently document U.S. disparities in health care access according to race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, gender, sexual orientation, and disability. Inadequate health care access contributes to poor health outcomes over the life course, leading to higher incidence of disease and chronic conditions and, consequently, to lower life expectancy among some population segments. Although a leader in technological innovation and development and among the highest in per capita health care expenditures, the United States consistently ranks among the worst in national health and health care outcomes compared with other developed countries. In 2006, U.S. Census Bureau estimates placed the number of non-elderly uninsured at approximately 46.1 million, a figure that does not include individuals experiencing discontinuous coverage. Further, costs continue to rise due to increases in chronic health conditions, an influx of expensive new technologies, and expanding definitions of what is medically treatable.

Policymakers, health professionals, consumers, and others recognize the need to reform the U.S. health care system. Strategies to improve health care quality generally take the form of incremental changes to the structure of health care financing or introduction and improvement of health care quality data collection and feedback mechanisms. Still, health care quality improvements from these reforms have been modest. Critics argue that these reform efforts neglect existing sets of beliefs at institutional and interpersonal levels that both impede meaningful health care reform and maintain the current system of inequitable care delivery. The failure of reform efforts points to the need to identify and understand ideological barriers to health care change.

Many argue that the only way the United States can achieve substantial improvements in health care quality is through the development of national health insurance (NHI). Successful adoption of NHI would establish the right to health care. Despite high levels of support for some sort of NHI among the public, previous efforts to institute NHI failed. Historically, labor unions and physician opposition, concretized in the lobbying efforts of the American Medical Association, helped undermine early reform efforts. Conservative political opposition, frequently aligned with the Republican Party, also rejects the notion that health care is a right, preferring to treat health care like other goods and services optimally provided through competitive markets. In support of this perspective, the American Medical Association, conservatives, and other opponents have been successful in mobilizing "myths" about the quality of the U.S. health care system as rhetorical devices to persuade policymakers that NHI is simply not a politically feasible option. These myths play upon commonsense beliefs about the U.S. health care system, including generalized beliefs that U.S. health care is "the best in the world," any existing problems are "not that bad," and the best solutions to any problems lie in privatization and the market. The dominance of such ideologies has led to the failure of significant reform attempts, ensuring that the current system of health care rationing, according to ability to pay rather than clinical need, continues.

Bibliography:

1) Geyman, John P. 2003. "Myths as Barriers to Health Care Reform in the United States." International Journal of Health Services 33(2):315-29.

2) Institute of Medicine. 2003. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care, edited by Brian D. Smedley. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

3) Mechanic, David. 2006. The Truth about Health Care: Why Reform Is Not Working in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

4) Schuster, Mark A., Elizabeth A. McGlynn, and Robert H. Brook. 1998. "How Good Is the Quality of Health Care in the United States?" The Milbank Quarterly 76(4):517-63.

5) Starr, Paul. 1982. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books.

Free term papers are not written to satisfy your specific instructions. You can use our professional writing services to buy a custom written research paper, term paper, or essay on Argumentative Topics at affordable price. CustomTermPapers is the best solution for those who seek help in writing term papers, essays, and research papers related to Argumentative Topics and other relevant topics.